(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 4".)
With philosophies is a bit like with our lungs:
everyone has them, and continually must
use them in order to live, although not
everyone, and not at all times, is aware that
they do exist and that he or she is using them.
After all, independently how the word "philosophy"
is defined in expensive books, in the everyday
practical application it means "a collection of
principles and rules which one follows in his
or her life" (note a paradox with living: even
if one does not follow any rules, still one lives
according to the rule "to not follow any rule" -
means one follows a "primitive parasitism"
described on this web page). Therefore, even
if one is not aware of doing this, one still follows
some kind of philosophy in everything that
he or she is doing. Only that usually the
philosophy that one follows is unstructured
and non-formalized: it just represents a medley
of rules which either are outcome of ones
emotional responses, or one picked them
up from the society in which he or she is
living. So usually one follows a chaotic
philosophy of impulses. In turn, if one
analyses where such a chaotic philosophy
leads him or her to (as this is done in the text
of this web page), then one realizes that
it leads either to nowhere, means downhill
in the moral field! The point which I am
trying to make here is that, since you already
follow a chaotic philosophy which leads you
to nowhere or downhill, why not try to learn
more on the subject of it by reading this
web page. Then perhaps it is also worth
to learn an exact reversal of this
parasitism,
means the much better philosophy called the
totalizm,
and with a small addition of effort adopt then
this better philosophy in the life.
Part A:
Introductory information about the philosophy of
parasitism:
#A1.
Totalizm or
parasitism -
means what it is all about in these two mutually competing philosophies:
Motto:
"Totalizm requires from us an effort in every possible dimension. But to parasitism we surround if we just have no morals nor brakes."
In our lives we would like to get clear directions.
In turn nothing is so clear as the idea of
"good" and "bad". In this idea everything
that surrounds us belongs to one out of two
major categories, namely either to the
category of "good", or the category of "bad",
means everything is either "white" or "black".
So although with the elapse of time we usually
discover that in true life nothing is really
completely "white" nor completely "black",
and that everything belongs to some shade
of greyish, or even is colourful, we still like
to categorise everything to one out of these
two categories. After all, it simplifies our life,
and makes all decisions much easier.
Therefore, we are eager to listen to claims
and to read articles, which explain to us
that e.g. butter is "bad" for us while
margarine is "good" (or vice versa).
Or that blessed breeding of children for
given religion is a "good deed" while a
pre-marital sex is a "sin". Or that capitalism
is a source of "prosperity", while communism
is a source of "deviations". Etc., etc.
This convenient categorisation of everything
to the categories of "white" or "black" fails
almost completely when comes to applying
it to people. After all, in people we do not know
really what we should categorise by - e.g. by
someone's dressing, or perhaps by someone's
look, or by how funny they are and by their sense
of humour, or perhaps by an amount of money
which they accumulated. In American films they
easily solved this problem, ordering to dress in
white all characters whom we should like, while
dress in black - all characters which we do NOT
supposed to like. However, as we know, in real
life people do not wish to follow these rules.
In the result, many of us spend life being
linked to undesirable people, and then paying
for this a big price. Fortunately, also in relationship
to people there is a criterion of qualifying,
which well explains who is for us "good" and
who is "bad". This criterion is based on
morality, or more strictly on categorising
people to two major philosophical categories
which define principles of behaviour of these
people. These two categories qualify every
person to either the group of these people
the life philosophy of which orders them
to act in principle "morally" in their lives,
or to the group - which act in principle
"immorally". Thus every person on Earth
in fact belongs to only one out of these two
categories. People who in principle act
morally are called here "totalizts". This is because
they adhere to a form of philosophy of life
called "totalizm". They could dress in
white, because in general they are "good"
both to themselves, as well as to all other
people. In turn people who in principle act
immorally are called here "parasites".
After all, they practice a form of philosophy
called "parasitism". They could dress in
black, because in general they are "bad"
both for themselves as well as to all other
people.
Of course, the sole knowledge that our planet
is populated by two categories of people, namely
"totalizts" and "parasites", nor the knowledge
that every person living on Earth belongs to
one out of these two basic categories, is not
much useful - if we do not learn how to recognise
fast who belongs to which out of these two
categories. So here turns out, that we need
web pages such as this one, and also the
related web page about
totalizm.
After all, these web pages teach us how to
recognise who in our surroundings belongs
to which out of these two categories. Thus,
these pages inform us also our contacts
with whom potentially can turn good for us,
or not so good, with the elapse of time.
The recognising of the philosophy of people with
which we deal represents only a marginal knowledge
at the moment. The reason is that
evil powers
which secretly operate on the Earth do not allow
correct knowledge about philosophy to be
disseminated amongst people. Because of them,
practically almost all descriptions of philosophies
in existence on the Earth, almost exclusively
concentrate on the presentation of arguments
pro and contra of some views invented by such
or other philosophers. But almost completely
they omit providing the practical knowledge
needed to categorise people. However, it is this
knowledge which is enormously vital for us.
Therefore, one amongst accomplishments of
this web page, is that it reveals a simple and
proven in action criterion of classification,
plus a whole range of principles, which allow
everyone to categorise people that they must
deal with, to one out of these two most vital
categories, namely to totalizts and parasites,
means to the ones who in principle are moral,
and to the ones who in principle are immoral.
Even a bigger problem depends on the fact,
that by not knowing about these two major
categories of people, means about totalizts
and parasites, it can happen that we ourselves
(or our children) unwillingly begin to act like
these parasites. So if we do NOT know what
the such a parasitic behaviour is all about,
then we are not able to get rid of it from our
habits. Thin in turn with the elapse of time
becomes a source of pain and disasters
for ourselves, and also for many other
people with whom we deal. This web page,
as well as the web page about
totalizm,
explains to us comprehensively, which
tendencies we should in ourselves (and
in our children) fight out, so that we do not
become such parasites.
The reason why totalizts are "white" characters
with a good influence onto others, is that in their
actions they try to always be "moral". In turn the
reason why parasites are "black" characters,
which always exert evil onto others, is that in
their actions they do not try to be moral at all.
So in the majority of cases parasites behave
"immorally", even if they do not know that they
act immorally. Unfortunately, one of the problems
of our society depends on the fact, that in
reality people do not know what is truly "moral"
and what is "immoral". After all, the source of
entire our knowledge about morality and
immorality are religions. Unfortunately for us,
religions were created in times when the human
knowledge was in a cradle. Thus religions
do not know that there is such thing as "moral
field" (i.e. a field similar to the gravity field,
which, however, instead of acting on motion
of masses rather prefers to act on our actions),
nor that there is such a thing as "moral laws"
(i.e. laws similar to laws of physics, but which
govern exclusively outcomes of our actions
in life). In turn without the knowledge about
moral field and moral laws, is almost impossible
to define precisely what in fact is moral and
what is immoral. Therefore, it is also good to
read this web page, as well as a related web page about
totalizm,
in order to learn what exactly is moral, and
what is immoral.
Our religions to-date, and our traditions,
reinforced also in people an interesting belief.
Namely, the majority of people believe,
that "in order to be moral one needs to
do nothing, in turn to be immoral one
needs actively and intentionally spread
evil and do immoral things". In the result
of this belief, when for example there is
an accident, hundreds of onlookers
who believe that that act "morally", do
nothing, allowing that the victim bleeds
to death. Just because of this common
belief, the philosophy of
totalizm
has now a hard life. After all, it discovered
that "in fact moral are only these activities
which climb uphill in the moral field".
Everything else, including also such
NOT doing anything, is fully immoral.
Thus, the difficult life of totalizm results
from the fact, that this philosophy must
now completely change these old thinking
habits of people. It must teach people that
in order something is "moral" it must
be active and intentionally completed in such a manner
that it lifts us uphill in the moral field; in turn
all other manners of doing this something,
including also NOT doing anything, are
"immoral". Because of this, another
important reason for which
it is worth to read this web page, is just to
learn this unknown earlier truth about what
really is "moral" and what is "immoral".
Namely learning that only things that are
"moral" must be completed purposely in
a manner required by moral laws. In turn
whatever is "immoral" can be done in
any other way, e.g. being guided by the
laziness, lack of discipline, contradiction,
wishes, impulses, stupidity, lack of
knowledge, etc. Immoral things can also
not be done at all (while they should be
done) - and still they will be immoral because
they will lift us uphill in the moral field.
The fact explained above, at which the philosophy of
totalizm
direct our attention, namely that "only moral
must be completed intentionally, while immoral
can be allowed to happen just by themselves",
introduces a very vital consequence for the
philosophy of parasitism discussed here. Namely,
it realises to us, that the philosophy of
parasitism
does NOT need to be practiced in an intentional
or aware manner, but it suffices when we allow
that it practices itself through us. Means
in order in our life we act according to the
philosophy of parasitism, in fact we need
to do or know nothing. It is enough that in
whatever we do we surround to our natural
inclinations, such as laziness, impulses,
humours, tantrums, anger, contradiction,
jealousy, etc. This is the reason why in our
world there is so many parasites. After all,
the only thing they need to do to practice
this philosophy, is to allow that this philosophy
practices and manifests itself though them.
So just in order to realise this shocking truth,
it is also worth to read this web page.
Totalizm is a philosophy which is exactly opposite
to parasitism in every possible aspect. And
there is a lot of these aspects. For example,
totalizm needs to be practiced intentionally,
while in parasitism it suffices to not have any
brakes. Totalizm is moral, while parasitism
is immoral. Totalizm generates so-called "moral
energy", while parasitism dissipates this energy.
Totalizm lifts in people the feeling of happiness,
while parasitism leads to a psychological depression.
Practicing totalizm allows to accomplish so-called
totaliztic nirvana,
while surrounding to parasitism leads to so-called
"death through moral suffocation". Totalizm
is good for these who practice it, as well as
to all other people from their surroundings,
while parasitism is bad for everyone.
Practicing totalizm is rewarded by moral
laws, while practicing parasitism is punished
by these laws. Etc., etc. One most vital aspect
which we need to take notice of, is that
totalizm is a permanent state, while parasitism
is a deteriorating process. This process
always leads downwards. Therefore, if e.g.
one year a practitioner of parasitism swears
at us, a next year he can bit us, while in several
years he may even kill us. After all, these
ones who surround to parasitism, continually
slip down in moral field. So similarly like
stars the matter of which also continually
slips along the gravity field, also these
adherers of parasitism with the elapse of
time reach the level of so-called "black hole"
in which any normal life is impossible. On the other
hand, if in a long term we know a practitioner
of totalizm, then his moral state remains
almost unchanged all this time. Means,
the morality of a totalizt remains always
almost the same. After all, the philosophy
of totalizm is a permanent state, not a process.
Thus during all years a totalizt can be trusted
almost the same, can be relied upon almost
the same, and is going to be helpful almost
the same. In order to learn just these facts
it is also worth to read this web page.
The technology on Earth seem to continually
develop. So if these
evil powers
do not manage to stop us soon, then not
long in the future people may build so-called
time vehicles.
On turn, at that moment instead of the living
through just one life, and then dying, these
people can live forever. This is because they
are able to repetitively shift back in time to years
of their youth. This in turn allows them to relive
again and again the entire their life, and
simultaneously to remember these repetitions
of their lives through which they already lived.
Unfortunately, such everlasting life obtained
through the repetitive shifting back in time has
one major drawback. Namely, sitting infinitively
long in front of television sets and viewing again
and again the same films, is no funny then
at all. In turn when someone realises then,
that is unhappy, then through repetitions of
this unhappy life such a person only makes
deeper and more powerful this feeling of
being unhappy. In the result, if time vehicles
are given to the civilisation which practices
parasitism like our present one on Earth,
then instead of making people increasingly
happier, they make members of this civilisation
to experience the true
everlasting hell.
The only salvation from this "everlasting hell"
is if before the first shifting back in time, these
people earn for themselves a kind of heavenly
state described on the web page about the
totaliztic nirvana.
Therefore, learning the significance of such
accomplishing of the totaliztic nirvana for our
future, and also understanding how practicing
parasitism makes impossible for us to accomplish
this nirvana, is an absolutely necessary
condition for saving ourselves from
"everlasting hell", and for accomplishing the
state of "everlasting happiness". The gaining
of knowledge about the necessity of fulfilling
this condition is still another one amongst a
whole array of vital reasons to read carefully
the content of this web page.
#A2.
Basic terminology: moral field, moral laws, philosophies of
totalizm and
parasitism:
Before we immerse ourselves into descriptions
which explain to us details of the destructive and
immoral philosophy of
parasitism,
and the essence of the differences of it from the moral
totalizm,
probably it would pay off, to learn a few basic
ideas and words, which are repetitively used
in the descriptions that follow. It is a bit like learning
to drive a car: before we take a driver's sit,
it helps to know what engine and brakes are,
what people understand by traffic sings and
what types of these are there, etc. This brief
introduction is just to explain these most basic
ideas, expressions, and words of parasitism
and totalizm, so that readers are able to understand
them, when they appear in the text which follows.
Of course, each of these basic ideas and words
are also thoroughly explained in the textbook of
totalizm and parasitism, means in monograph
[1/4]. After all, if someone chooses to abandon
the destructive and adopt moral totalizm in his
or her life, then he or she needs to understand
perfectly each one of them. Because of these
comprehensive explanations that are available
in monograph [1/4], this item provides only the
bare minimum about each idea and each word -
just enough for the reader to know what this is
all about. But if you notice that you still get entangled
in the brief descriptions from this item, and find
them too theoretical, you should not hesitate to
skip through them without reading, and proceed
directly to next item #A3. Only later, when you
meet a word that you do not understand, try to
return to this item #A2, and find out what this
word actually means.
The most basic fact, which can be proudly
announced regarding totalizm and parasitism,
is that - otherwise than this is the case with almost
all other philosophies, totalizm nor parasitism
was ever "invented", or "given" to us. Totalizm
and parasitism are simply outcomes of applying
a new scientific theory, called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
to everyday life situations. (The Concept of Dipolar
Gravity is described comprehensively in chapters
H and I of monograph
[1/4]).
Especially the moral philosophy of totalizm
was derived from this new Concept of Dipolar
Gravity, in a manner similar like in physics are
derived new equations, which describe the
universe around us. In turn parasitism
was formed, when it become obvious that in
real life such a moral philosophy as totalizm
must also have its immoral opposite, means
the philosophy of parasitism. Thus, new findings
of this Concept of Dipolar Gravity, are the major
source of such a huge effectiveness and success
of totalizm, and such close to real life description
of parasitism. For example, one of the most vital
contributions, that this new Concept of Dipolar
Gravity introduced to totalizm, is the discovery
of the so-called moral field that previously
remained unknown. This moral field, alike the
gravity field, is also a primary field of our
universe. It behaves similar to the gravity field,
but it interacts with thoughts, motivations,
attitudes, and feelings of people (instead
of interacting with objects and masses -
as the gravity field does). Moral field is
a mirror copy of gravity field. Similarly
like this is the case when masses are
moved upwards, or uphill, in the gravity
field, also someone's motivations can
be moved upwards, or uphill, in this
newly discovered moral field. When
such an uphill movement of motivations
occurs, a specific moral effort, or work,
needs to be done. The reason is that
this newly discovered "moral field" has
a structure very similar to gravity field.
It allows to clearly distinguish, which
our mental efforts are going upwards,
and which our intentions are going
downwards in this moral field. Namely,
when someone's motivations are going
downward in the moral field, then similarly
as when someone goes downward in
the gravity field, NO work of lifting needs
to be completed. Thus a downhill motion
in the moral field is easy, effortless, and
pleasurable. In turn an upward movement
in the moral field always requires an effort
to be put into it.
The fact that the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
disclosed existence of the moral field, bears
countless practical implications for us. Let us
now list a few most important of these implications.
For example, the existence of moral field
explains why there are two moral poles
in everything that takes place in our universe.
This means that the operation of moral field
explains, why everything that takes place in
our universe, is either "moral", or
is "immoral".
Well, when one realizes that there is such
thing as this moral field, which is a kind of
a steep field similar to gravity, then every
motion that is done within the range of this
field, must either go uphill, or go downhill,
in this moral field. The moral field is somehow
so designed, that everything that goes
uphill in this moral field, simultaneously fulfils
the definition of being "moral". In turn
everything that runs downhill in this moral
field, simultaneously fulfils the definition of
being "immoral". For this reason, at the
moment when we begin to understand the
concept of moral field, we also start to
understand clearly the concepts of "moral"
or "immoral". Furthermore, the moral field
allows also to establish precisely, what is
more, or is less, moral or immoral from
something else. For example, the more
moral from others are all these activities,
which run more steep uphill in the moral
field (in turn, for immoral things: the more
immoral from others are all these activities,
which run more steep downward in the
moral field). Because when we go uphill
in any possible field, including also this
moral field, we need to put a significant
effort (work) into this motion, the existence
of the moral field causes that "everything
that is moral, is also difficult to accomplish,
and requires an effort to be put into it", and
"everything that is immoral, is also
easy to accomplish, and does not require
any effort to be put into it". (Notice that
these rules apply to everything that is moral
or immoral, e.g. to peace and war, to truth
and lie, to improving and spoiling, to earning
and stealing, etc.)
The moral field shines a totally different light
onto the totaliztic understanding of "moral" or
"immoral" human actions. The reason is that,
because of the existence of the moral field,
no human action in itself, is neither "moral"
or "immoral". This action only becomes
"moral" or "immoral" in the effect of motion
that it undergoes in the moral field (i.e. a
given action is "moral" - when it ascends
upward in the moral field, and is "immoral" -
when it descends downward in the moral field).
In turn a current configuration of the moral field,
depends on the circumstances in which a given
action takes place. This means, that whether
a given action is "moral", or is "immoral",
in totalizm depends entirely on the configuration
of momentary circumstances, in which a given
action is carried out, and does not depend
on the action itself. In the light of totalizm,
exactly the same action, one time can be
"moral", another time can be "immoral".
(As an example consider slapping someone
who lost conscience, and slapping an
anonymous passer by who is peacefully
walking on a street, or digging in a private
garden and digging on a public road.)
Therefore, in order to qualify a given action
to a category "moral" or "immoral", totalizm
requires from us to learn exact circumstances,
in which this action occurs. Totalizm never
allows to consider actions in separation
from circumstances in which they occur,
and always requests to carefully determine
how these actions are relating to the moral
field that is formed by these circumstances.
All mistakes in the correct qualifying actions
to categories "moral" or "immoral", according
to totalizm, always result from errors in our
evaluation of circumstances, and thus the
moral field, in which these actions are to
take place. (Notice that parasitism always
acts opposite than totalizm does.)
The existence of moral field, and the existence
of clearly defined moral poles (i.e. the pole
"moral" and the pole "immoral"), causes that
every form of human activity can be carried
out either in a moral manner, or in an immoral
manner. Therefore, all manifestations of human
activities which we see around us, we can,
and we definitely should, qualify to one of
two basic categories, namely to "moral" or
to "immoral". And so, in life we meet people
who intuitively or intentionally practise a moral
philosophy called here totalizm, and other
people who practise a highly immoral philosophy
called here parasitism. Such moral people
this web page calls "totalizts",
while such immoral people it calls "parasites".
All intelligent organisms, in this web page
called "intellects", can and should
be classified into one of these two major
classes of totalizts or parasites. For example,
there are managers of various institutions, or
politicians,
whom the philosophy that they practice
qualifies either into the category of totalizts,
or into the category of parasites. There are
even entire institutions, and even
countries,
which because of the philosophy that dominates
in them, qualify themselves as either totaliztic
institutions or countries, or parasitic institutions
or countries. Of course, there are also scientific
institutions, as well as individual scientists,
which in every their activity intuitively climb
uphill in the moral field, and thus practice
the moral science that we should call the
"totaliztic science". But there are
also scientific institutions and individual
scientists, which should be called "parasitic
science". For this parasitic science and
parasitic scientists, in everyday life already
a popular name was coined of the
"orthodox science". Therefore,
this web page keeps this popular name,
only clarifying - after the content of subsection
H10 in monograph [1/4], what exactly
one should understand by it. (Notice that
the philosophy that is adhered by the
science and by scientists commonly
named "orthodox science", is definitively
a philosophy of parasitism. Thus, according
to subsection H10 in monograph [1/4],
the name "orthodox science" is actually
a polite synonymous to a name
"parasitic science".) People, institutions,
and entire countries, may act morally
telling truth, practicing peace, and doing
good deeds, or may act immorally – lying,
instigating wars, and spreading evil.
Although this qualifying into categories
"moral" or "immoral" is actually carried
out by the behaviour of interested parties
themselves, we, means people who are
affected by this behaviour, in our own
interest should start to notice it, categorise
it, and name it correctly. After all, when
such qualifying and naming is correctly
accomplished, it becomes obvious for
us, what we should expect from these
people, institutions, or countries, and
how we should relate to them.
The existence of moral field puts also a different
light on such human behaviours as "going
along the line of the least intellectual resistance",
and "going against the line of the least intellectual
resistance". As we know jolly well, many humans
prefer to live their lives by "going along the line of
the least intellectual resistance" - as this is an
effortless and pleasurable kind of behaviour.
But if one analyses this behaviour from the
point of view of moral field, then it turns out,
that going along the line of the least
intellectual resistance, is equal to going
downhill in this moral field - therefore, this
is a decisively "immoral" behaviour typical
for the parasites. The reason is that,
the line of the least intellectual
resistance represents the path downhill,
along the steepest gradient (slope) of moral
field. In this way, by knowing a simple rule,
that "moral is everything that goes against
the line of the least intellectual resistance",
now we start to understand, why one of the
recommendations of totalizm states:
"in all matters always do the exact
opposite to what the line of the least
intellectual resistance prompts you to do"
(for more details see subsection JA4.1 from
volume 6 of monograph [1/4]).
While addressing the matter of motion along
the line of the least resistance, it should be
mentioned that totalizm distinguishes as
many as three different lines of the least resistance.
For moral phenomena these lines are equivalents
of three basic dimensions from the three-dimensional
physical space designated by a height, width, and depth.
(In three-dimensional moral space equivalents
of these three physical dimensions are intellectual
effort, physical effort, and feelings.) The line
of the least intellectual resistance is that one,
which requires the least mental effort, meaning
the least thoughts, memory, knowledge, logic, etc.
It is usually selected by immoral people (parasites)
and other immoral intelligent beings. The extension
of this line in the opposite direction is the line of
the highest intellectual effort. This one is selected
to be followed by people of highly moral philosophy.
In turn the line of the least physical resistance
is the one, which requires the least physical work
(of the thoughtless type). Along the line of the least
physical resistance always move the untamed nature
(e.g. rivers flowing downhill of mountains, electricity,
etc.), and especially lazy people. The extension of
this line in the opposite direction is the line of
the highest physical effort. This one is selected
in actions of people usually described as "workaholics",
or less politely as "strong but stupid". Finally the
line of the least emotional resistance is the one,
which requires the smallest contribution of feelings
into a given action. Along the line of the least emotional
resistance always act people usually called "cold"
or "deprived of feelings". The extension of this line
in the opposite direction is the line of the highest
emotional contribution. This one is selected in
action of people usually described as "exalted",
or less politely as "hysterics". In relationship to
moral field, all these three lines run in three different
directions, namely all three lines are mutually perpendicular
to each other - see their more comprehensive
descriptions in subsection JA4.1 from volume 6
of monograph [1/4]. Out of all three of them,
only the line of the least intellectual resistance
(thus also the line of the highest intellectual effort)
is coinciding with the greatest gradient (slanting)
of the moral field slope. As examples of
these three lines consider two methods of sewing
tens of buttons to a new suit: (1) with hands,
using an ordinary needle and thread, and
(2) with a sewing machine. The hand sewing
would be more aligned to the line of the least
intellectual resistance then machine sewing,
because it almost does not require any mental
and technical skills, although it requires putting
a sizeable physical effort. In turn the machine
sewing would be more aligned with the line of
the least physical resistance then the hand
sewing, because it almost does not require
any contribution of physical effort, but it requires
putting an intellectual effort. But when during
the completion of any of these methods someone
missed the button and sewed his or her own
finger, then for example, responding in an
anger he or she could throw the suit to a
rubbish tin, acting along the line of the least
emotional effort. Of course, in real-life,
various current circumstances would
additionally alter the course of the moral
field, making it to run closer to one of these
two ways of sewing. Humans and other
intelligent beings must be aware of the
existence of these three different lines
of the least resistance, in order to be able
to determine what is good for them,
means to be able to choose actions,
which are "moral". Note that moral
actions are always "running against the
line of the least intellectual resistance"
and "along the line of the highest intellectual
effort". (But notice that whatever "runs
against the line of the least physical or
emotional resistance" and "along the line
of the highest physical or emotional effort"
is NOT "moral" at all.)
When we start to analyse such ideas, as moral
field, going along the line of the least intellectual
resistance, motion of our motivations within moral
field, etc., then we notice that there are definite
regularities in ways these ideas relate with each
other. Two examples of such regularities we
already brought to light before, when we
discovered that "everything that is moral,
always runs uphill in the moral field", or that
"everything that is moral, is difficult to accomplish,
and requires an intellectual effort to be put into it".
These regularities are very similar to these ones,
which are described by physics, when it analyses
gravity field, potential energy, motion of masses
in gravity field, etc. Because physics named the
regularities that it describes, with the term "laws",
therefore totalizm introduced a term "moral
laws". By the term "moral laws", we should
understand laws, which describe mutual relationships
between basic ideas explained in this subsection,
such as moral field, moral energy, motivations,
feelings, intellects, motion of human motivations
within moral field, etc. As everything from this
web page, also moral laws will be explained
in more details in the further parts of monograph
[1/4] (see over there subsections JB3.4 and I4.1.1).
Moral laws clarify even further the position of
moral poles. Because of the existence and
operation of these laws, "moral" is
everything that is agreeable with the
moral laws. In turn as "immoral"
must be defined everything that runs against
moral laws. In the light of these new definitions,
the only rule of totalizm to "pedantically obey
moral laws" can be simplified to the rule
"do in your life only these things, which
totalizm defines as moral".
The existence and operation of moral laws,
places people in the situation of necessity of
making continuous choices regarding their
behaviour in relation to these laws.
After all, in whatever people do, they can
either choose to do it in such a manner
that obey these moral laws, or do it in such
a manner that they disobey these laws.
This means that people can either in their
lives mainly do mentally difficult and laborious
things that run against the line of the least
intellectual resistance, and thus is agreeable
with moral laws, or mainly do mentally
pleasurable and effortless things that run
along the line of the least intellectual resistance,
but are contradictory to moral laws.
In turn these two choices of basic
behaviours in life, lead to the development
in people two opposite philosophies of life,
or two opposite stands concerning everyday
living. On this web page, and also in my
monographs, these two opposite philosophies
are called "totalizm" and "parasitism".
Totalizm is the philosophy of life, or the
stand taken about the way of conducting
our lives, which says that we always
should "pedantically obey moral laws" -
means that we always should do only
things which run upward in the moral
field, or which totalizm describes with
the use of word "moral". Thus
totalizm chooses to complete only
these actions, which are agreeable
with our current priorities and preferences,
but which run against the line of the
least intellectual resistance, and
therefore which constantly require
from us to put significant effort and
labour in everything that we do.
In turn parasitism always chooses
to do the most easy things, which run
along the line of the least intellectual
resistance, and thus which in fact are
always "immoral".
#A3.
How the philosophy of
parasitism
should be defined:
Parasitism is a philosophy of life, or the
stand taken about the way of conducting
our lives, or a type of moral disease, which
represents the exact opposite of totalizm.
(This is why parasitism is a major adversary,
or enemy, of
totalizm,
and also why parasites always instinctively
attack totalizts, and try to destroy them.)
Parasitism takes a stand that in life
we always should "disobey every possible
law, unless forced by someone or something
to do otherwise". This means that the
adherers of parasitism disobey all moral
laws, as well as disobey every other kind
of laws about which they believe they can
get away without obeying them. Parasitism
does not need to be learned, or intentionally
practised, as it always appears naturally when
a given person, or group intellect, follows the
line of the least intellectual resistance, and
refuses to obey whatever it should, thus
rolling itself effortlessly down the slope of
moral field. After all, such effortless rolling
downhill in moral field requires that a given
person must refuse to obey anything that
it should obey (i.e. refuses to obey anything
that requires putting an intellectual effort
into it). But in spite that it eventuates naturally,
parasitism is a distinct philosophy, which
has a recognizable form, and which always
displays the same set of distinct philosophical
features - for details see chapter JD from
volume 8 of monograph [1/4]. For example,
adherers of parasitism almost never
follow any rule (or more strictly, they
always follow the rule "to not follow any
rule"), they always act at their internal
impulses, they always choose the solution,
which is the easiest way out, they always
willingly do only these things, which bring
them power over other people, wealth,
or fun, and they always viciously attack
adherers of totalizm over whom they feel
to have some advantage of power
(although they never attack anyone
that they consider to be stronger than
them, as this would require an effort
and courage - quantities that they
never spare). Parasitism is naturally
acquired by all these people, who
believe that in life they should do
only pleasurable things, which
require little effort, or no effort at all.
Unfortunately for the parasites,
all pleasurable things by definition
must run along the line of the least
intellectual resistance. Therefore,
these things slide the person who
does them, steeply downwards in
moral field. Of course, one cannot
infinitively fall downhill. Therefore
these practising a parasitism always
finishes with a catastrophe (on a
similar principle, as solar systems,
which always follow the line of the
least resistance, at the very end
always reach the state of an
astronomical "black hole"). For
this reason, in the light of totalizm,
practising a parasitism is even
worse than living a criminal life.
This is because these ones who
live criminal lives have limits how
bad they could be, while these ones
who practice parasitism, have almost
no limits for their evilness. It is rather
shocking, that in spite of being so
anti-moral, parasitism is so dominant
presently on Earth, and that everything,
starting from our mass media, and
finishing on numerous religions, are
promoting parasitic ways of living.
To make it even more anti-moral,
in order to be able to lead such a
pleasurable life, people who adhere
to parasitism, always need someone
else who does all the work for them,
while they only reap fruits of this work
and do nothing. Therefore adherers
of parasitism can only survive, if they
turn others into slaves, and then live
from these slaves by exploiting them
in a thousand and one different ways.
This is the reason why, the adherers
of this philosophy, are called "parasites".
Because of this necessity to have slaves
who work for them, parasites lead lives
of intelligent parasites. (This parasitic life
is the reason for the name "parasitism"
being used to describe their philosophy.)
Depending on the way how parasites disobey
moral laws, there are two versions of parasitism.
These are named the "primitive parasitism" and
the "refined parasitism". Primitive parasitism
is the one, in which adherers do not know yet
about the existence of moral laws, therefore it
disobeys these laws simply by brutal breaking
them. People on Earth currently practice
primitive parasitism. In turn refined parasitism
is the one, the adherers of which already know
about the existence of moral laws, therefore
they do not break but also do not obey these
laws, rather carefully work somehow their way
around moral laws. If parasitism is practised
by a large institution, a country, or a whole civilization,
we call it "institutional parasitism".
Institutional parasitism has this terrible property,
that it forces parasitism on everyone who is
within sphere of influences of a given parasitic
institution. Therefore, if institutional parasitism
overtakes a whole civilisation, then there is no
escape from this moral disease, and everyone
must become a parasite, while the whole such
civilization finally must self-destruct itself. Finally,
when an institutional parasitism becomes so
deviated, that parasites start to mutilate and
murder their slaves to make impossible for
them to free from the enslaving, then such
the most deviated form of parasitism we call
an "evil parasitism".
Destructive actions of evil parasites are
described comprehensively on a number
of web pages, for example on pages
evil,
destructive use of UFO vehicles,
bandits amongst us,
WTC,
26th day,
Columbia,
landslips and mudslides,
Katowice,
Katrina,
tornadoes,
hurricanes,
plague,
Możajski,
evolution, and
predators.
As one can gether from these web pages,
our planet is just secretly occupied by these
"evil parasites" from space. In present times
these evil parasites are called
UFOnauts,
while in past they used to be called "devils".
#A4.
Goals of this web page:
If we look at any person, we immediately
can notice whether we like his or her
appearance, e.g. whether is clean and
well dressed, or rather dirty and slack.
A bit more difficult is to learn attributes
of the character of this person. After all,
we need to get to know this person a lot
better to realise whether he or she is
friendly, helpful, with sense of humour, etc.,
and whether his or her personality are
preferable for us. But the most difficult is
to learn the philosophy of this person.
On the other hand, on this philosophy
depends practically everything what
is the most important. After all, from
the philosophy depends whether this
person acts morally, whether says truth,
is peace oriented, whether we can rely
on him or her, etc.
Fortunately for us, learning the most vital
categorising of someone's philosophy may
also become easy. We only need to understand
that all people divide into two basic categories.
Namely into totalizts whom obey moral laws,
and parasites who disobey moral laws. If we
deal with a totalizt, then more or less we can
trust such a person. After all, in principle he
or she is going to act more or less moral.
But if we encounter a parasite, then we must
be beware. After all, such a person has
immorality written into his or her principles
of behaviour.
The most vital goal of this web page is just to
learn to distinguish between these two basic
categories of people, namely totalizts and
parasites. Especially to learn recognise
attributes which designate that we are just
dealing with someone of a parasitic philosophy.
Additional goal of this page is to summarise
the most vital information about the philosophy
of parasitism. Especially to explain how practicing
parasitism in life induces tragic fate for individual
people and for entire civilisations.
Fig. #1. A huge sculpture of the Hinduism god Murugan
located by the entrance to Batu Caves in Kuala Lumpur.
In order to announce him to be a "god" for ancient Hindu
it sufficed that the
time vehicle
which he had make him immortal, and that his technical
devices were able to make spectacular "miracles".
It did not matter that this scary "god" let himself known
from the savage behaviour which was a perfect illustration
for the actions of people who follow exclusively principles
of the philosophy of
parasitism
in their lives.
It turns out that people until today are like these ancient
Hindu - they judge others by the appearance and by gadgets
they have, instead of by the philosophy which they practice.
This in turn allows for easy spread of evil and destruction.
The above sculpture of the scary god guards entrance
to so-called "Batu Caves", means a place of Hinduism
warship in w Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was photographed
in March 2005. Although followers of Hinduism take the
creature illustrated with this sculpture for one of their
gods, actually this creature is just one amongst many
parasitic
UFOnauts
who occupy humanity since the beginning of history,
and which in old times used to openly show to people.
(Presently UFOnauts continually hide from people
behind the screen of so-called
state of telekinetic flickering.)
For the fact, that he was just an
UFOnaut
who "show off" amongst scared Indians with his
advanced technology, not any
god,
clearly indicate these two sleeves which are to absorb
oxygen from the atmosphere, which he could use for
aiding his breathing, and which hanged down behind
both sides of his shoulders. Furthermore, these
sleeves disclose why he was such a cunning person.
After all, their standard length designed for a
UFOnauts of an average size in his case turned
out to be too long. In the result, both these
sleeves he was pulling along the ground. This
in turn means that he was a "small man" - i.e.
much shorter in size than the rest of UFOnauts.
So he had a "small man syndrome" (a "chip on the
shoulder") which he used to take onto innocent
people from the Earth who crossed his path. His
syndrome also manifested itself in him having
two wives. (One wife was a queen who gave him
the entire her country, while another was a forest
girl at whom he pounced somewhere in a bush.)
Of course, when he persecuted and murdered people
that crossed his path, with a typical for UFOnauts
cunningness he always explained to his surroundings
that he only persecutes them because they are
"bad people" and enemies of "his nation". Behaviours
of this "god" were very aggressive and savage, means
exactly such as are characteristic for a parasitic
creature which got a young body due to shifting
back in time to years of his youth via the
time vehicle,
while his mind is still the mind of a grumpy, sinister,
bitter, and disappointed with life oldie, who grips to
so-called "imprisoned immortality" in spite that the
philosophy of parasitism which he practices causes
that he lives in conditions of
everlasting hell.
It should be noticed that UFOnauts always loved to
impersonate divine figures. For example, in the
era of Christianity they favoured to impersonate either
Jesus or
Mother Mary (e.g. in Fatima).
Result is such, that the majority of paintings of Jesus
chave the characteristic "buttock" shaped chin, while
the majority of church paintings of Mother Mary have
an unique triangular face - which both anatomic details
are very typical features for UFOnauts. (For more
information about anatomy of UFOnauts see descriptions
from web pages
aliens or
changelings.)
An interesting detail in the clothing of the above
"god", which reader probably already noted, is
a kind of a "garland" of artificial flowers made
of cloth, which protects the penis of this "god".
The reason for which this "garland" is so
prominent, is the fact that because of the
repetitive shifting back in time, many UFOnauts
who make use of the so-called "imprisoned
immortality" described in item #E1 of this
web page, has troubles with the erection of
their penises. (Clearly their civilisation does
not use "Viagra".) After all, in spite that their
body is young, their minds are old and have
thousands of years. On the other hand, as
we know, the erection of penis is controlled
by the mind. This situation is very unfortunate,
because a majority of UFOnauts are "sex-maniacs".
So in order they still are able to have sexual
intercourses, some UFOnauts have kinds of
tubular stiffening implants chirurgicaly inserted
into their penises. In the result, their penises
are continually like in the state of erection and
must be especially protected. In present times
UFOnauts do not brag that their penises are
continually erected. This fact is only noted
intimately by Earth women raped on decks
of UFO vehicles. But in old times UFOnauts
did not hide this fact from people. Therefore,
for example on page 165 of the book
[1P5] (originally written in German,
but also available in the Polish language
version, in which I analysed it) by Erich von
Däniken, entitled "Czy sie mylilem? Nowe
wspomnienia z przyszlosci" - means "Was
I wrong? New recalls from the past" (The title
of the original: "Habe ich mich geirrt? Neue
Erinnerungen an die Zukunft"), Published
by Prokop, Warszawa 1994, ISBN 83-86096-00-4,
a following description of ancient Indian "gods"
is provided, quote:
"In Mahabharata, which is based on much
older sources, gods are described as physical
beings, who do not blink with their eyes, who are
always young, and whose 'garlands' never wither away."
(This description originates from the section
written by the Indian Professor - dr Dileep Kumar
Kandzilal, and entitled "Latające maszyny w
starożytnych Indiach" - means "Flying machines
in ancient India", which is published on pages
158 to 167 of the book [1P5].) The reason for
which I quoted here this description is that on
the above photograph the reader can actually
see the 'garland' which protects the penis of
this UFOnaut. For more information about the
content of the book [1P5] - see subsection P5
from volume 13 of monograph
[1/4].
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you
may use, including the popular "Internet Explorer", allow also to
download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged
to the size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
Part B:
Summary of the basic information about the philosophy of
parasitism:
#B1.
What "practicing" the philosophy of
parasitism
is all about:
Motto:
"In order to practice
totalizm
one needs to act pedantically moral. But
in order to 'practice' parasitism, one does
not need to do anything, but only allow
parasitism to manifest itself through oneself."
When we start to talk about "practicing a
given philosophy", immediately in the
imagination of the listener appears a vision
of the necessity to learn principles of a
given philosophy, and then troublesome
fulfilling these principles in our lives. In
fact this is true for the majority of philosophies,
e.g. for
totalizm.
In order to act according to totalizm, one
firstly needs to learn the only principle of
this philosophy, and then obey this principle
in everything that one does. (This only
principle of totalizm states "whatever you
do, always do it in a pedantically moral way".)
But the above is completely UNTRUE in
relation to the philosophy of parasitism
discussed here. As it was explained in
item #A1 above, in order to "practice"
parasitism, one does NOT need to do
anything, apart from a passive surrounding
to whatever this philosophy tempts us to
do in subsequent life situations.
Explaining this in other words, only totalizm
needs to be practiced intentionally - parasitism
practices itself. This is why in present world
there are so many parasites, and so few
totalizts.
The chief behavioural pattern of people, who in a completely
unaware manner practice parasitism in everything
that they do, is a principle that do not obey
in our lives anything to the obeying of which we
are NOT forced somehow. In other words,
these people with the same passiveness and
laziness do not obey "moral laws" - for breaking
of which they are later punished severely by
natural mechanisms of the operation of universe,
as they do not obey also all other laws, principles,
or duties, of any kind, e.g. governmental
laws, traffic codex, principles of relationship,
family requirements, professional duties,
orders and jobs, etc.
From this point of view, the people who
practice the philosophy of parasitism are
exact reversals of people who practice
the philosophy of
totalizm.
After all, the chief (and the only) principle
of totalizm states "pedantically obey moral
laws in everything that you do". In turn
such a pedantic obeying moral laws for totalizts
means also the pedantic fulfilment of all
other obligations and jobs.
Of course, the following a principle to not obey
anything to the obeying of which we are not
forced somehow, is not a kind of aware action
of these people. In years of someone's youth,
means in the initial phase of practicing,
parasitism depends on natural leaning to
temptations, lack of discipline, and inner
laziness, which always fall onto everyone
and which everyone needs to overcome in
order to undertake a given action. This laziness,
or a lack of inner discipline, in every situation
when it is obvious that not doing something
is going to be unpunished,
whispers something along the line to the ear
of such initial adepts of parasitism: "why you
should do this if no-one is watching you right
now - rather do nothing and play, or rest,
or sleep slightly longer".
Unfortunately, as time flows while professional
duties and family life become increasingly
complex, this initial leaning towards temptations
of the inner laziness and the lack of discipline
transforms in them into a lack of abilities.
After all, in times when their totalizticaly
oriented colleagues learned how to plan and
do one's work, and how to carry out one's
endeavours up to the end, the adherers of
parasitism have not acquired any of these
abilities. In the result, when the tasks and life
becomes very complex, even when they would
try to accomplish something, they are lacking
the mental qualities and skills that would allow
them to take the matter to the very end. Thus,
as years elapse, such adherers of parasitism
become increasingly less capable of action,
and the increasingly more skilful in hiding
from others this their inability to act. They
do this hiding by increasingly more cunning
manners of utilising other people for doing
their own work. In the result, in a more
advanced stadium, parasitism depend on
hiding one's own inability to act, through
increasingly more skilful forcing others to
carry out the work of a given person.
Thus gradually such people transform into
increasingly bigger social parasites who live
exclusively out of the work of other people.
But because they do not do any work by
themselves, they also do not generate for
themselves any so-called "moral energy"
described in part C of this web page. In turn
having a deficit of this moral energy, their
life philosophy gradually transforms into a
deadly moral disease, one of the most
visible symptoms of which is the psychological
depression.
As the above explains, parasitism is NOT
neither a state or just a version of someone's
life philosophy, but in fact is an ever worsening
process of someone's moral fall down.
From this point of view parasitism differs
drastically from
totalizm
which is just someone's stable philosophical
and moral state.
#B2.
People practicing
parasitism,
means parasites:
People who are affected by this deadly
moral disease and philosophy, and
who allow parasitism to become their
everyday (major) philosophy, in this
monograph are called parasites.
The reason for this name is that they
are not productive by themselves - they
only live out of the work done by other
people. They simply keep inventing
ways, which alow them to turn other
people into slaves, and to rob these
other people from whatever is possible
to rob. For this reason people infected
with the moral disease of parasitism
are leading lives of intelligent parasites.
They rob and exploit everyone who
gets into the sphere of their influences.
If they meet something that manages
to resist their robbery and exploitation
attempts, they simply destroy it - of they
can.
Parasitism appears in two versions, namely
primitive and refined. A primitive parasitism
is practised in societies which, like presently
our planet, do not know moral laws, as yet.
Therefore primitive parasites commonly
break moral laws, and, of course, get heavy
punishment for this breaking. This causes,
that in spite of trying to do in life only things
that bring pleasures to them, actually all
parasites on Earth live very miserable i
primitive lives, and totalizts can only be
sorry for them. A refined parasitism
appears in the advanced civilisations,
which already learned about the existence
of moral laws, but have not accepted the
path of totalizm. Therefore, in their actions
they choose to rather go around these
moral laws, than to obey them. The life
of these parasites is more pleasant,
although in order to go around moral
laws, they need to use various sinister
methods, e.g. these of enslaving other,
less advanced civilisations, and to turn
these less advanced civilisations into
slaves who do all dirty work for them.
Therefore civilisations, which adhere
to this advanced version of parasitism,
with the elapse of time become "evil
parasites" described in subsection A3,
JD8 and JD11, and in chapters U to W
of monograph [1/4].
The most extensively a refined parasitism
is practiced by members of civilisations which
already accomplished technical devices called
time vehicles.
The reason is that intelligent beings which
have time vehicles are able to avoid punishments
for braking moral laws with just simple empirical
manoeuvres. Such beings, in every case when
a punishment for breaking moral laws gets them,
simply shift their time back, while in a new passage
of time they choose such actions and such path
through their life, that they avoid this punishment.
Therefore, for the owners of
time vehicles
moral laws which punish ordinary (mortal) people
so severely, rapidly loose the punishing power.
But this lost of punishing power of moral laws
towards members of civilisations which already
have time vehicles does NOT mean at all, that
these civilisations escape from the punishing hand of the
universal intellect (God).
This universal intellect (God) was enough wise
that He build a punishment into the very system
of escaping of these creatures from an ordinary punishment
by moral laws. Namely, He caused that these
creatures live in a constant danger of the situation
called the "non-existing existence" described in
part E of this web page. Although these creatures
live, the use of time vehicles by them causes that
in fact they are nonexistent already for a long time -
for more details see item #E5 of this web page.
An example of the parasitic civilisation which just
now leads such a "non-existing existence" are
UFOnauts
which just now secretly occupy our planet.
#B3.
Empirical indicators which warns about a deficiency of so-called
"moral energy"
in a given person, and thus which are symptoms of practicing
the philosophy of parasitism by this person:
Parasitism is a kind of deadly moral
illness, which troubles almost every person
who leads an immoral life. This illness
destroys its victims due to gradual elimination
of their life giving moral energy - as this is
described more comprehensively in item
#C4 of this web page. Although no-one
carried out any research in this area, I
personally believe that because of the
parasitism dies more people than because
of any other illness. For example, I believe
that almost all suicide victims in fact die because
of parasitism. Similarly as every other illness,
also parasitism is displaying a number of
symptoms which result from the drop in
level of moral energy in a given person.
In turn we are able to utilise these symptoms
for recognising these people who have
fallen to this illness. In the further part of
this item I am going to list and explain
most important amongst these symptoms.
Every person who clearly shows the
presence of several from these symptoms,
for sure is already well advanced in sliding
down in grips of parasitism.
Symptoms of parasitism described below are
reversely-proportional to "µ". Their evident
presence in someone certifies that the level
of someone's "µ" is lower than the threshold
for parasitism value of µ=0.35. Note, that the
more dominant a given symptom is in someone,
the lower is value of "µ" in this person, and
the more deep this person's "µ" slides down
below the value of µ=0.35. In turn the lower
"µ" someone reached, the more dangerous
for life and health is the advancement
of the murderous moral illness called
parasitism in this person.
1. Procrastination. This is one amongst
most reliable indicators from which we can recognise
people that slide down into the grip of parasitism.
The reason for a chronic procrastination with
everything is in these people the main doctrine
of parasitism, stating that "do not do anything
for doing of which you were not forced somehow".
So in every situation when a parasite feels that
nothing forces him to complete a give action,
or that someone pushes him against the wall
but still he may get away without completing
activities which should undertake, this parasite
will not do what he supposed to do. Of course,
in order to not feel guilty because of this, for
himself and for other people he is going to
explain that he just only postpones this activity
for a bit later - only that this later never comes.
Such a chronic procrastination of everything is
as old as humanity itself - after all parasitism
is a natural moral illness of humanity since the
beginning of time. Therefore on the subject
of "procrastination" numerous research is
carried out - the publishing results of
which their authors also procrastinate as long
as they can get away with. Examples of results
of research concerning this subject were
published in the article "Procrastination
research takes twice as long", from page B3
of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Saturday, January 13, 2007.
In this article is written amongst others, quote:
"In 1978 only about 5 per cent of the American
public thought of themselves as chronic
procrastinators. Now it was 26 per cent, ...",
"People who procrastinate tend to be less
healthy, less wealthy, and less happy.")
Pity that these who researched this procrastination
do not know about the moral illness called
parasitism. After all, then results of their research
would be more obvious, while the phenomenon
of procrastination itself would then be easier
to understand as one amongst symptoms of
this illness. Furthermore, understanding that
parasitism kills its victims by development of
other illnesses in them, would explain the above
quotation which in fact means that practicing
parasitism (or more strictly - the lack of
morality) is the primary source of all illnesses.
2. Depression. Experiencing a frequent
psychological depression, is one of the most
sure indicators, that someone's "µ" is already
fallen down, below the level, which can be considered
as safe. Actually frequent depressions mean,
that the situation is very serious already, and
that a given person is at the brink of a moral
catastrophe. From moral depression there is
only a short step to the self-inflicted death by
moral suffocation, as it is described in subsections
JD1.2 and JD4.2 of monograph [1/4]. People
who have a very low "µ" seem to continually
live in the state of chronic depression, and in
their lives they go from one state of depression
into another one. If we notice in others, or in
ourselves, the tendency to fall in depression,
this should be a warning signal, that there is a
very urgent need to increase the level of the
moral energy in this intellect. Further detail
about depression are explained in item #C5
of this web page and in isubsection JE4.1 from
monograph [1/4].
3. Sarcasm. Although sarcasm and the
sense of humour externally may look similar,
morally there is a huge difference between them.
Sarcasm is aimed at hurting others, without
having to bear consequences (thus to make
someone unhappy). In turn the sense of humour
is to make someone laugh, thus to make people
happier. Intellects with high "µ" do not seem
to use sarcasm, and only use their sense of
humour. But as "µ" drops down, intellects become
increasingly sarcastic, while sarcasm starts
to replace in them the disappearing sense
of humour. Sarcasm, differently than the sense
of humour, always is oriented towards hurting
someone (i.e. towards causing the pain) - not
towards causing a fun. Also, it is always directed
on someone else, and never concerns or includes
the giver of sarcasm (sarcastic people never are
sarcastic about themselves). Furthermore, in
cases when it is reciprocated, the sarcastic
person usually manifests that is offended, and
responds with aggression. The deeper and
more hurting someone's sarcasm is, the
lower "µ" of this intellect, and the more advanced
stage of his or her parasitism.
4. Aggression, short temper, rowdiness,
caprices, and other attributes certifying for
emotions taking control over reasoning.
For intellects with low "µ" emotions become
a leading force in their life, whereas the use
of reasoning, planning, and consistency is
diminishing. Therefore such people are easy
to upset, everything seems to irritate them,
they easily burst with anger, show temper,
response with repressions, etc. The lower
someone's "µ", the higher tendency for
initiating a quarrel under any excuse, for
starting a fight, for attacking others, and
for other actions which give relief to their
overinflated emotions and aggressiveness.
In turn for people with a high "µ", the significance
of emotions is dropping down, and it is
replaced with reasoning. The higher
someone's "µ" the less probability that
this person takes a part in a raw or fight,
the less frequently it shows "low" emotions,
the less aggressive and the more peaceful
towards other people he or she is.
5. Erratic behaviour (including the tendency
for a "sort-lived enthusiasm", and hot tempers).
When "µ" is lowering, intellects tend to become
erratic in their intentions, views, attitudes, friendships,
decisions, etc. This erratic behaviour is affecting
all their aspects, not just emotional or sexual life.
For example in institutions, which have very low
"µ", such an erratic behaviour makes almost
impossible to conclude any project, all machines
and devices are used as long until they break
down for the first time - because there is no
consistency and devotion to repair and to maintain
them, everything is appreciated only for a very
short time when it is new, while when it is known
better - it is shovelled into a corner and forgotten,
employees and business partners are continually
changed because there is no consistency in
appreciating someone's values, services, or
cooperation, etc. Similarly happens with people
and countries with a low "µ".
6. Hypocrisy. It depends on differences
between what is said and done, what one says
in eyes, and says behind the back, on difference
between the image that one disseminates and
reality, on domination of the form over content,
etc. The hypocrisy deepens if someone's "µ"
is falling down. The most important symptom
of hypocrisy boils down to discrepancy between
someone's propaganda philosophy and life
philosophy, which is expressed with the coefficient
of deception "cd" described in subsection JB7.2
of monograph [1/4]. This discrepancy increases
with the fall of someone's level of moral energy.
In intellects, such as a substantial part of present
scientists, for which "µ" fall below the threshold
of destructiveness, the angular difference between
these two philosophies can reach even around
cd=180?, means that for propaganda reasons,
and officially, they pretend that they serve one idea
(e.g. reinforcing peace, increasing the quality
of human life, etc.), while actually with their actions
they serve the completely opposite idea (e.g.
escalating death and destruction, poisoning
natural environment, etc.).
7. Ostentatious appearance and behaviour.
There is an interesting regularity connected with
a level of someone's moral energy: namely the
less someone has it, the greater effort he or she
takes, to make other people interested in him or
her. Although methods with the use of which,
someone tries to make other people interested,
depend on upbringing, state of mind, and cultural
circle in which someone lives, they always are
taking an appearance and behaviour, which are
ostentatious. In case of appearance, the less of
moral energy someone has, the more ostentatious
tries to look. Thus the more effort is going to put
in whatever he or she dresses, and adopts in his
or her dress the more components, which are
aimed at shocking and gaining the attention.
So if for example we notice that someone colours
his or her hair into unnatural colour - e.g. into
green or pink, or has a beard or mustache,
while his religion does allow to cut the hair,
or has a shocking tattoo in some well visible
area, or carries huge earrings in the tang,
nose, or ears (especially if this is a man),
or likes screaming colours and outrageous
dresses, or uses any other way of gaining
attention of other people, then we should be
very cautious with such a person - as he or
she has a very low level of moral energy.
The same concerns ostentatious, outrageous,
shocking, or unpleasant behaviours - e.g.
loud talking when there should be a silence,
trying to always be in the centre of attention
(e.g. by the side of a leader), constant
causing problems to someone, etc. But
if the level of someone's moral energy
increases, starting from around µ=0.4
a given person ceases to feel a subconscious
need to gain attention of others, because
this attention is already gained in a natural
manner by the field formed from the
moral energy that this person accumulated.
Therefore people with high "µ" try to only
look clean, pleasant, and tastefully, and try
to behave unassuming, thus eliminating
from themselves everything that is screaming
and oriented towards gaining attention of others.
8. Indecisiveness. As it turns out, someone's
ability to make decisions is also strongly impacted
by moral foundations that someone have
(sometimes also called "moral skeleton"
or "morality"). Therefore people who do
not have such foundations (or skeleton)
show both the low level of moral energy,
and inability to make decisions. This inability
of people, or group intellects, with low "µ",
to make any decision, have quite simple
justification. Everyone who has such moral
foundations, usually relies in his or her
decisions on the recommendations which
result from morality (means moral people
in life always simply try to do whatever in
their opinion is morally correct). But people
who do not have moral foundations, in their
decision only consider their own interests
and benefits (although understood incorrectly,
because these interests are not based on morality).
Unfortunately for them, the empirical experience
teaches them fast, that whatever they would
decide, it always later in some way turns out
not right for them (see the "Principle of Counterpolarity"
described in subsection I4.1.1 of monograph [1/4]).
Therefore, taught by these unpleasant experiences
that are outcomes of the Principle of Counterpolarity,
in every situation that requires a decision, they
are unable to decide what would be the most
"beneficial" for them, therefore they delay the
decision, seek suggestions of others (so that
they could later blame others if something
goes wrong), many times they change the
decision they made before, etc. In the result,
they develop a tradition of delaying every
decision as long as possible, changing their
position, and avoiding taking the final stand.
Therefore, if in our life we meet a person,
an institution, or a government, which have
a very low ability to make any decision, we
should realize that also their "µ" is equally
low, not mentioning their morality.
9. The level of complications and ambiguity.
Intellects with a low "µ" have a strange ability
to entangle practically everything that they touch,
and to make it extremely complicated and
ambiguous. For example people with a low
"µ" do everything in a very complicated and
illogical manner, they communicate with a lot
of ambiguity, they never act directly, their
friendships, connections, cooperations, etc.,
are complicated, their matters unclear and
ambiguous, etc. Also institutions with a low
level of moral energy make complicated
and ambiguous: their personal structure,
their organization, their system of promotions,
their system of rewarding, accountancy,
manner of operating, products, goals, etc.
In countries with a low level of moral energy
almost everything is complicated beyond
recognition. So complicated and ambiguous
is their: communication system, banking,
laws, tax system, formalities, procedures
of getting permits, politics, etc. In countries
and in other group intellects, which have
extremely low moral energy (at the level
of µ < 0.1), everything becomes so
complicated and ambiguous, that it
becomes almost impossible to untangle,
and thus practically everyone who has
something to do with them, is forced to
break some of their regulations from the
simple reason that these regulations are
impossible to obey. In turn as "µ" grows,
the tendency for ambiguity and complication
is diminishing and being replaced with
clarity and simplicity. In intellects with
a high level of moral energy, everything
becomes clear, transparent, unambiguous,
logical, and easily understandable.
10. The infestation of quarters with insect
parasites. In my continuous globetrotting,
which caused the need to live, work, and socialize
with various people, I discovered a rather
interesting regularity: "the level of insect
parasites in quarters that are occupied by
a given intellect, are reversely proportional
to the level of moral energy of this intellect".
In order to express this in other words, flats,
houses, and quarters of people or institutions,
which needs to be cleaned and maintained
by the own effort of these people or institutions,
have the more insect parasites, the less moral
energy these intellect have. By the expression
of "insect parasites", one needs to understand
the variety of insects. They can include the
most troublesome insects, which therefore
are the most easily noted by people, such
as fleas, and sometimes also lice, or/and
bed bugs. They can also include the most
popular recently and quickly spreading throughout
the world microscopic creatures called "mites".
Of course, further popular kinds of insect pests,
which swarm quarters of people with low level
of moral energy, and thus which can be used
as an indicator of this level, include flies and
cockroaches, while for whole societies - also
mosquitos. On the same principle, also quarters
which are occupied by institutions with a low level
of moral energy, are usually swarming with
various insect parasites. Thus it is not unusual,
when after siting in such an institution on a soft
chair, we rapidly start to feel how fleas or mites
are scrambling on us, or to see cockroaches
running across the floor. Also the territories of
countries with a low level of moral energy, in
average have a higher level of various human
parasites and unpleasant insect pests, than
territories of countries with a higher level of
moral energy. In the result, in countries with
a low level of moral energy, we can get lice
when we get into a public bus or train, while
a night spend in even the good hotel we need
to pay out with our own blood.
11. Working via hands of others. People
whose "µ" dropped down to a very low level,
have this increasingly deep tendency to turn
other people into slaves, and to make them
to work for them. In initial stage, this tendency
starts to reveal itself in form of constant calling
for help. Whatever they do, they always make
others to help them, even when the involvement
of other people is obviously unnecessary.
They rush for help in even the most banal
matters. This tendency increases with the drop
of "µ", and in a more advanced stage it
manifests itself through an attempt to turn
others into permanent slaves of a given parasite.
It is interesting that involving other people,
and constantly calling them for help, serves
a multitude of different purposes. For example,
it hides the idleness of a given person,
it emphasises his or her "achievements",
it directs attention of others to him or her,
it also provides potential "escape goats"
in all situations when something finally
goes wrong - and usually it does go
wrong when handled by people with
a low "µ", because they have a huge
talent to turn everything into a disaster
(in such cases, the fault is pushed onto
those ones who helped).
12. Noisiness. It is quite difficult to
justify a connection between someone's
noisiness, and morality expressed with
the level of moral energy. But this connection
does exist, and it was noted not only by me,
but also by the folk wisdom of many nations,
which recorded it in the form of numerous
proverbs. For example, it is expressed in
such proverbs, as the English "Empty vessel
makes the most noise", the Malay "A turtle
silently lies thousands of eggs, while chicken
lies one egg and the whole village must know"
(i.e. "Penyu bertelur beribu-ribu seorang pun
tiada tahu, ayam bertelur sebiji pecah khabar
sebuah negeri"), or the Polish "Silent water
rips the banks" (i.e. "Cicha woda brzegi rwie")
and "The cow that is the most noisy, does
not give any milk" (i.e. "Ta krowa co najwiecej
ryczy, mleka wcale nie daje"). I personally
believe that this connection has something
to do with the subconscious need to divert
attention from ones inability to accomplish
anything constructive, and also with the
reinforced from the times of childhood
the lack of respect for others, the lack
of respect for rights of others to peace,
and with an ordinary arrogance. The
rule seems to be, that the smaller
someone's "µ" is, the more noise
a given intellect produces (means
the lauder this person speaks, the
more people makes involved in
whatever is doing, the more loudly
this person is announcing every
"accomplishment", and the more
sources of noise is able to activate).
Therefore, in order to estimate "µ"
for a group intellect (e.g. for an institution)
it is enough to check the level of
noisiness in areas full of people,
where silence should prevail (e.g.
where accountants are counting
salaries, engineers are making
projects, or scientists are developing
theories). In turn for whole countries,
the noise level can be estimated
after checking at nights the populated
areas, where silence supposed to
prevail, e.g. in living quarters, in
hotels of high class, hospitals, etc.
The recommendation of totalizm,
which is derived from the connection
between "µ" and the level of noise,
is very clear. It states: "keep far from
individuals who generate a loud noise
in many ways simultaneously, i.e.
loudly speak, frequently yell, and
do everything in a very noisy manner -
especially in areas and situations
where the tactfulness, ethics, and
morality would suggest to be silent.
This is because such individuals
have a serious moral problem.
Similarly try to not work in noisy
institutions, or stay long in noisy
countries. (It should be noted,
however, that someone's loud
speaking, but without simultaneous
making noise in many different
ways, may simply be a sign of
someone's hard of hearing,
not low "µ").
#B4.
Consequences of the saturation of entire institutions, countries,
and civilisations with people who surround to the philosophy of
parasitism:
With elapse of time a parasitic philosophy takes
over a whole group intellect, e.g. a family, a group
of students, a crowd from a football match stadium,
an entire institution, a country, or even the entire
civilisation, then we call it an "institutional parasitism".
My research done on groups of students seems
to indicate (see subsection JD6.2 in monograph
[1/4]), that an institutional parasitism starts to
manifest itself decisively in a given group intellect,
when 30% of its personnel, or 30% of its management,
reaches the advanced stage of individual parasitism.
When this ratio increases further, the institutional
parasitism is getting increasingly deep. In recent
years an ever increasing number of institutions
and countries on Earth, starts to be taken over
by such institutional parasitism. Simultaneously,
increasingly less totaliztic institutions and countries
remain on Earth. Practically, according to my
estimates, the generation of people to which I
belong, probably is the last generation on Earth,
which personally experienced life in totaliztic
countries, and work in totaliztic institutions.
Thus this generation is the last generation
on Earth, which still remembers times, when
people were not afraid to go on streets, and
would not need to barricade in their homes,
when footpaths in cities were full of laughing,
happy, and looking with optimism into future
people, when people had almost a guarantee
for employment and for a source of income,
when a jestful and professional treatment at
work were a norm, not an exception, etc., etc.
This privileged generation of people, has a
kind of moral duty to describe exactly for
future generations, how life and work in
totaliztic institutions and countries used to
look like, and how it differed from present
life and work under institutional parasitism.
I do hope that this web page is a part of my
own contribution to the fulfilment of this
moral duty.
Part C:
The relationship between moral energy and a philosophy and
self-esteem of a given intellect, especially in relationship to followers of
parasitism:
#C1.
What is this
moral energy
and for what we need it:
Moral energy is a kind of energy which
we accumulate in ourselves when we
carry out any morally correct physical
work. (This morally correct physical
work is a work which does NOT break
any moral laws.)
#C2.
How we express the amount of this
moral energy:
For expressing moral energy two quantities
are used. The first of these is a total amount
"E" of moral energy which is expressed in
units called the "hours of physical struggle"
or [hps]. Another manner of expressing
the moral energy is so-called "relative
level of saturation with moral energy",
usually marked with a coefficient named
"µ".
These people who continually accumulate in
themselves large quantities of moral energy,
with the elapse of time start to experience a
phenomenon called the
nirvana.
Such a "nirvana" is simply a spontaneous
overflowing of excess of moral energy through
natural valves in our body usually called
"chakras". The nirvana is a reversal of the
state called "depression". Depression is a
state which someone accomplishes when
has almost no moral energy.
#C3.
Relationship between moral energy and someone's philosophy:
In order to accumulate in ourselves moral
energy, we need to carry out morally correct
physical work. Unfortunately, people who fall
into claws of parasitism almost do not do by
themselves any morally correct physical work.
In the result they do not gather any moral
energy in themselves. In turn the deficiency
of this energy leads them to a state of
depression. A reversed situation show
totalizts. They do a lot of morally correct
physical work. Thus they usually accumulate
a lot of moral energy in themselves.
The level of moral energy that someone
managed to accumulate in his or her
counter-body, is a reflection of the morality
of this person. Therefore, it is very important
for us to have a tool, which allows us to
estimate this level, before it is too late.
After all, in the present philosophical
climate we need to be careful with
whom we deal, and whose company
we seek. It is already very well known
to parents, that if their children get into
a "bad company", this spells troubles.
After all, there is a saying "he who
sleeps with dogs awakes with fleas" -
meaning bad attributes of our companions
are going to be passed onto us.
In this type of problems, totalizm
gives us helpful hand, because
according to totalizm "the moral
quality of a given intellect is reflected
in the level of the moral energy
that this intellect accumulates
in a given environment".
#C4.
Relationship between "µ" and states of intellects:
In this subsection we are going to discuss the most important moral conditions that various intellects experience while their "µ" changes. Within the entire range of "µ" values, that an intellect may experience, i.e. within the range from µ=1 to µ=0, there is several distinct moral conditions or states, that this intellect acquires when its "µ" value reaches specific levels. In this subsection we are going to explain these conditions, and describe "µ" at which they prevail. Of course, we need to remember that in reality there is a smooth transformation from one condition to other, and also that the values of "µ" provided here are only approximate (let us hope that in future some totaliztic researchers will appear, who are going to measure them exactly).
The most distinctive conditions, which are experienced by intellects, who change their "µ" within the whole range of possible values, can be called: (1) nirvana, (2) adoration, (3) friendliness, (4) provocativeness, (5) marasmus (malaise, indolence, lethargy), (6) destructiveness, (7) moral death. Let us discuss each of these conditions separately. Here they are:
#1. Nirvana. This is a very special state, which a given person accomplishes, when he/she accumulates so much moral energy, that the value of his/her "µ" exceeds µ>0.6. The border value of µ=0.6 is even called a "nirvana threshold" and is marked with the symbol "µnirvana". People who exceeded with their "µ" this particular value of "µnirvana = 0.6" are starting to feel extreme happiness, which is dynamically gushing from inside of them. Because of this happiness, and also because of the high concentration of moral energy in them, they look in a very special way, and also they spread around themselves an unique energy field, which is telepathically and sensually perceived by other people. This look and energy field makes them very special. Therefore everyone who has the honour to meet someone in nirvana, and who knows the descriptions of nirvana from subsection JF6, should have no difficulty with recognizing them. Nirvana, and all phenomena which it induces, are described in chapter JF.
#2. Adoration. This state is accomplished by people, whose "µ" reaches the value of around µ=0.5. It is a state, which for those who are increasing their moral energy, appears shortly before the state of nirvana. People who accomplished this high level of around µ=0.5, as a rule always practice philosophy of totalizm. They are surrounded with a kind of powerful energy field, that makes them admirable for all others, who practice totalizm. Therefore they are usually worshipped by the totaliztic people from their environment. Simultaneously, they also like everyone around them, who practices totalizm. The only people whom they do not like, are those individuals who practice parasitic philosophy - especially those in the advanced stadium of parasitism. Such people whose "µ" is around µ=0.5, are experiencing a mixture of very unusual and pleasurable feelings. They feel continuous satisfaction from their life, and a kind of fulfilment. They also feel a happiness, which is making impression of "being compressed" in them, and awaiting to be released to outside.
#3. Friendliness. This is the most common state of positive and moral people in present times. It is accomplished by people whose "µ" is at the value of around µ=0.4. People who have their "µ" at this value of around µ=0.4 are friendly, helpful to others, positive, and cheerful. They go on with their lives, contributing positively to the society and carrying out their tasks in a normal positive manner. They laugh and have happy moments, and generally lead happy lives.
#4. Provocativeness. This is the first negative level of morality, which is accomplished by people who allowed their "µ" to drop as low as around µ=0.3. In typical cases achieving so low level of "µ" by a mature person (i.e. not by a teenager who is still prepared to listen his/her subconsciousness) is synonymous with this person adopting parasitism in his/her life. These people start to display a number of negative features, and start to be labelled by their environment as "provocative" and difficult to live with, although they are still able to perform their every-day activities and duties. If they wish, they still can be polite, although they sometimes tend to blast with emotions. Their actions start to display a number of unpleasant habits of the behaviour, some of which include turning others into slaves, and everyday use of power-games, hostilities, force, black-mailing, issuing alternatives, etc. All these immoral behaviours are supplemented with the worst of them, i.e. with a moral vampirism, which people with µ<0.3 start to commonly practice to supplement their moral energy. The biggest problem with this state is, that if someone slipped down to it without any important event of the misfortune type, usually it means that this person already reached the state of a creeping parasitism, and therefore he/she does not finish at µ=0.3, but he/she is going to keep slipping down even more.
#5. Marasmus (malaise, indolence, lethargy). People who allow their "µ" to slip as low as around µ=0.2 start to display the very negative "state of marasmus" (marasmus = malaise, indolence, lethargy). They start to make everything incredibly complicated, and practically are unable to complete any task. They are only able to talk, but unable to act. They start to lead unproductive, parasitic, and disturbing to others, life. They actually live at the cost of others. They also experience frequent states of powerful depressions and the feeling of the lack of interest of other people in them, which in many cases lead to spectacular "suicides" (i.e. to spectacular damage of own body in the sight of other people, but still aimed at not hurting themselves, but causing as much inconveniences to other people as possible; therefore it is used only in circumstances when they have assurance that other people do not allow them to die). Totalizm states that such intellects, which during an adult life reached such a destructive state of malaise, are already so-called "agonal intellects", the morality of which is so bad, that they are unable to improve it by themselves.
#6. Destructiveness. This is the last state of intellects, before the moral death. It is accomplished when "µ" falls as low as to around µ=0.1. People, who accomplished this state, are extremely destructive both to themselves and to their environment. For themselves, they display suicidal tendencies, which otherwise then suicides committed during the malaise, this time in fact are aimed at finishing their own lives. Furthermore, they fall victims of various destructive addictions, deviations, etc. Their psychology is also very unstable and deviated. They not only live in a state of a chronic depression, but also they display continuous aggressiveness and unpleasantness to other intellects. Actually they are very dangerous, as in their twisted minds they can conceive, and carry out, practically every destructive action, that lies in their physical capabilities.
#7. Moral death. It is always "self-inflicted" in one or other way by victims themselves, although frequently (as this is almost every time with people of a low "µ", who by themselves are not able to accomplish almost anything), it uses other people to bring the death, or it uses "accidents". It gets every intellect which allows its "µ" to drop to the level µ=0. This is a very unpleasant way of dying, as it leaves a lot of bad memories in all these who used to know a given intellect. Especially, that before it comes, the dying immoral individuals always resort to a very unpleasant moral vampirism in order to delay the death. The death through a moral suffocation is not a different manner of dying, but any rapid death of a random nature, e.g. dying in a car accident, falling out from a window, drowning, getting lost in a cold night, perishing in a fire, and only sometimes it takes the form of the most meaningful moral death, which is committing a suicide.
The existence of conditions described above, and the fact that "µ" is the only factor that we need to change in order to change our condition, is a shocking discovery, which stands in opposition to everything that our orthodox science claimed so far. After all, before totalizm was developed, everything was explained by extremely complex mixture of personality, psychology, environment, emotions, stimuli, etc. Only totalizm revealed the simple fact, that who we are and how we feel, it mainly depends on the level of moral energy that we accumulated, thus is a direct outcome of the moral content of the life that we lead everyday.
The above should be complemented with an information that the fact of slipping someone's level of moral energy dangerously close to a deadly µ=0, always is preceded with a clear warning signs. To these warnings belong:
A. The increase of emotional instability.
B. The increase of aggressiveness.
C. Experiencing the frequent depressions.
D. Appearance of suicidal tendencies.
Thus if these warning signals appear in someone, whom we love or wish well, it is a sure sign that the morality of this person is going astray and that this person is close to a death by moral suffocation. The only
![Fig. #1 (C1 in [7/2])](wyglad/murugan.jpg)